simpsons just ain't for kids.. it's way too dysfunctional. rather ironic that they call it familty entertainment. just look at what you've got.. drunked cum couch-potato father, rebellious plus trouble-maker son, daughter whose only concern is everyone and everything that's not related to her family and a mother who has no idea how to deal with her drunked cum couch-potato husband, rebellious plus trouble-maker son and daughter whose only concern is everyone and everything that's not related to her family. i suppose maggie's the only decent character in the show.
however.. it's still good humour while it lasted. we adults think it's childish.. i mean, seriously. looking at homer.. don't you think he's dumber than your average 4 year olds? yet the show can be kind of misleading for children. but there's already so many screwed up kids programs out there.. winnie the pooh is another classic. for starters, how weird is it for christopher robin to be talking to his stuffed toy, thinking it's actually alive. pooh eats honey and has the IQ of probably 20. then there's piglet.. he's a guy who's pink and has the guts smaller than anything. eeyore's the emo one. kanga and roo is another funny pair. ever wondered where's roo's father? (single-parent family.. not exactly very healthy context for children. no offense though). tigger is the hyper-active destructive thing. i guess rabbit and owl are alright. and that's winnie the pooh for you.
well, i agree when they say television destroys creativity. (to some extent)
Saturday, 4 August 2007
penned at 2:11 pm
Labels: miss ng thinks that..
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment